Human Papilloma Virus - HPV
How dangerous is HPV? The medical facts may surprise you!
www.health-science-report.comAdvertise here

Best Fundraiser Ever!
No up front costs. No minimums.
75% profit. No delays. Start today.
For groups, teams, individuals, schools.

www.NorthPoleFundraising.com

HPV Virus Treatments - Risk


Br J Cancer. 2005 Mar 28;92(6):990-4.

The psychological impact of human papillomavirus testing in women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic cervical smear test results: 6-month follow-up.

Maissi E, Marteau TM, Hankins M, Moss S, Legood R, Gray A. Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, Thomas Guy House, Guy's Campus, London SE1 9RT, UK.

State anxiety (S-STAI-6), distress (GHQ-12), concern and quality of life (EuroQoL-EQ-5D) 6 months after human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic smear test results were assessed based on a prospective questionnaire study, with 6-month follow-up after the smear test result. Two centres participated in an English pilot study of HPV testing. Participants included two groups of women receiving abnormal smear test results: (tested for HPV and found to be (a) HPV positive (n=369) or (b) HPV negative (n=252)) and two groups not tested for HPV (those receiving (c) abnormal smear test results (n=102) or (d) normal smear test results (n=288)). There were no differences in anxiety, distress or health-related quality of life between the four study groups at 6 months. Levels of concern about the smear test result remained elevated in all groups receiving an abnormal smear test result, and were highest in the group untested for HPV. Predictors of concern across all groups receiving an abnormal smear test were perceived risk of developing cancer, being HPV positive or untested for HPV, sexual health worries and the smear being a woman's first smear test. The raised anxiety and distress observed in women immediately after being informed of an abnormal smear test result and that they are HPV positive was no longer evident at 6 months. Concern about the smear test result was however still raised in these women and those who tested negative for HPV, and particularly among those who did not undergo HPV testing.


Int J Cancer. 2005 Aug 10;116(1):136-43.

Cumulative 5-year diagnoses of CIN2, CIN3 or cervical cancer after concurrent high-risk HPV and cytology testing in a primary screening setting.

Hoyer H, Scheungraber C, Kuehne-Heid R, Teller K, Greinke C, Leistritz S, Ludwig B, Durst M, Schneider A. Institute of Medical Statistics, Information Sciences and Documentation, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany.

The aim of our study was to assess the cumulative 5-year diagnoses of CIN2, CIN3 or invasive cervical cancer (CIN2+) after concurrent screening by high-risk HPV test and Pap smear in a primary screening setting. Four thousand thirty-four women from Eastern Thuringia/Germany were recruited from 1996 to 1998 for baseline screening that included routine cytology, high-risk HPV testing by consensus primer PCR GP5+/6+ and routine colposcopy. After a median of 59 months 3,153 women participated in final screening using identical methods. Women with abnormal cytology or colposcopy or a positive high-risk HPV test at any time during the study period were recalled for expert colposcopy and histologic verification. CIN2+ was detected in 160 women resulting in a cumulative 5-year proportion of 4.4% (95% CI: 3.7-5.0%). Of 3,702 women who were high-risk HPV negative at baseline, 34 (1.1-95% CI: 0.7-1.4%) had either prevalent CIN2+ or developed CIN2+ within the observation period. HPV/cytology double negatives at baseline were at lowest risk for CIN2+ (1.0-95% CI: 0.7-1.4%) compared to screening positives (16.8-100% depending on combined test results). The 5-year negative predictive value in HPV-/Cyto- women was 99.0% (95% CI: 98.6-99.3%). This suggests that a prolongation of the screening intervals in this group is feasible. However, it should be noted that 1 woman developed a microinvasive carcinoma within the observation period. Moreover, 2 women with prevalent cancer were missed by both tests. The prognostic relevance of concurrent high-risk HPV/cytology screening needs to be verified further by randomized trials. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.


Int J Cancer. 2005 Aug 10;116(1):110-5.

Chlamydia trachomatis infection and persistence of human papillomavirus.

Silins I, Ryd W, Strand A, Wadell G, Tornberg S, Hansson BG, Wang X, Arnheim L, Dahl V, Bremell D, Persson K, Dillner J, Rylander E. Department of Medical Microbiology, Lund University, University Hospital at Malmo, Sweden.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) persistence is the major cause of cervical cancer, but most HPV infections will not persist and risk factors for HPV persistence are not well known. Chlamydia (C.) trachomatis infection seems to also be associated with cervical cancer. We investigated whether C. trachomatis infection is a risk factor for HPV persistence. In a cohort of 12,527 women participating in a population-based HPV screening trial in Sweden, 6,418 women completed testing for HPV DNA by general primer PCR and typing by reverse dot blot hybridization. On average 19 months later, 303 women that had been HPV-positive and had normal cytology at enrollment completed a new HPV test. Environmental exposures were assessed by an 87-item questionnaire. Previous sexually transmitted infections were also investigated by serology. At follow-up, 44% of the women were positive for the same type of HPV DNA as at enrollment. Persistence correlated with length of follow-up (p < 0.01) and condom use seemed to protect against HPV persistence (p < 0.05). The most significant risk factor for persistent presence of HPV DNA was self-reported history of previous C. trachomatis infection (relative risk in multivariate model = 2.09; 95% confidence interval = 1.05-4.18). We conclude that persistence of oncogenic HPV infections is more likely among women with a previous C. trachomatis infection. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.


Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Apr;97(1):206-13.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) up-regulates epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) in cervical cancer in vitro: this action is mediated through HPV-E6 in HPV-positive cancers.

Mathur RS, Mathur SP. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Suite 634, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.

OBJECTIVES: Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGF-R) up-regulation in cervical cancer cells leads to an increase in cell proliferative Insulin-like Growth Factor II (IGF-II) and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and a decrease of the anti-proliferative IGF-binding protein-3 (IGF-BP3). The objectives for this study are: (a) to find if VEGF, in turn, up-regulates EGF-R and down-regulates IGF-BP3; (b) to determine if human papilloma virus (HPV-E6) mediates this action of VEGF in HPV-positive cells; and (c) to verify if these effects are reflected in changes in cell proliferation METHODS: We used HPV-positive HeLa (Black), ME-180 and CaSki (Caucasian) and HPV-negative HT-3 (Caucasian) cell lines. (a) Levels of HPV-E6 in the HPV-positive cells were enumerated after treating the cells for 24 h with 20 ng/ml of VEGF using our semi-quantitative immunofluorescent antibody assay. (b) Cellular levels of EGF-R, HPV-E6, IGF-II and IGF-BP3 were enumerated in ME-180 and CaSki cells incubated for 24 h with 5, 10 and 20 ng/ml of VEGF. (c) HPV-negative HT-3 and HPV-positive ME-180 and CaSki cells were incubated with 20 ng/ml VEGF alone or in combination with antibodies to HPV-E6 and EGF-R. HPV-E6 (measured only in HPV-positive cells), EGF-R, IGF-II and IGF-BP3 levels were measured. (d) Cell proliferation was determined using cell proliferation Bradykinine-U colorimetric assay, in HT-3, HeLa and ME-180 cell lines in the presence of VEGF alone and with HPV-E6 antibodies. RESULTS: (a) In all the HPV-positive cell lines, 20 ng/ml VEGF significantly increased (30-50%; P < 0.0001) the HPV-E6. (b) In the ME-180 and CaSki cells, VEGF treatment up-regulated EGF-R, IGF-II and HPV-E6 and down-regulated IGF-BP3 in a dose-dependent manner (P < 0.001). (c) These effects of VEGF were eliminated when the HPV-positive cells were co-incubated with antibodies to HPV-E6 or EGF-R. In the HPV-negative HT-3 cells, VEGF decreased IGF-BP3 while increasing EGF-R and IGF-II levels. Antibodies to EGF-R eliminated these effects (P < 0.0001). (d) Treatment with VEGF resulted in increased cell proliferation in HT-3, HeLa and ME-180 cells; co-incubation with HPV-E6 antibodies abrogated this effect only in the HPV-positive cells. CONCLUSIONS: In cervical cancer, VEGF up-regulates EGF-R and down-regulates IGF-BP3, thus amplifying the cell proliferative activity of EGF-R. This action of VEGF seems to be mediated, directly through EGF-R or indirectly through HPV-E6 in the HPV-positive cancers, while EGF-R up-regulation appears to play a major role in the HPV-negative cervical cancers.


Virology. 2005 Apr 10;334(2):294-8.

HPV16, HPV18, and HIV infection may influence cervical cytokine intralesional levels.

Fernandes AP, Goncalves MA, Duarte G, Cunha FQ, Simoes RT, Donadi EA. Department of General and Specialized Nursing, School of Nursing of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Av. Bandeirantes, 3900, 14049-902 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil.

Infection with oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) is considered to be the major risk to cervical cancer. This study analyzed the influence of HPV infection on cytokine intralesional levels in cervical lesion in the presence or not of HIV infection. Cervical biopsies from 42 women were studied. HPV detection and typing were performed using amplified DNA hybridized with sequence-specific primers, and cytokine intralesional levels were detected using ELISA. HPV16+ biopsies exhibited increased IFN-gamma and IL-10 when compared to HPV16- (P = 0.03 and 0.04, respectively). HPV18+ biopsies exhibited decreased TNF-alpha (P = 0.009) and IFN- gamma (P = 0.01) when compared to HPV18-. In accordance to HIV status, HIV-/HPV16+ patients exhibited increased IFN-gamma when compared to those presenting HIV-/HPV16- (P = 0.007). HIV-/HPV18+ patients presented decreased IFN-gamma when compared to HIV-/HPV18- (P = 0.02). These results suggest that the presence of HPV16 infection may influence cervical lesion installation, and irrespective of HIV status, HPV18 infection may be more aggressive than HPV-16.

HPV Virus Treatments - HPV Risk Links

Anal HPV Risk Factors - Forces of Nature provides genital wart and vaginal warts treatment information.

Increased HPV Risk - Learn how acquiring a new partner is linked to increased HPV risk among young women.

Your Sex Life - A very informative article from InteliHealth News Service.

HPV Wart Picture, HPV Disease, HPV Pictures, Picture of HPV, HPV Shot VaccinationHPV Symptom in Man, HPV Information, Pregnancy and Cervical Dysplasia, HPV Virus in Man, HPV HIVHuman Papilloma Virus Treatment, Human Papilloma Virus Cure, Human Papillomavirus Infection, Genital Wart Contagious, Genital Wart TreatmentCervical Cancer Treatment, Pregnancy and Cervical Dysplasia, Cervical Cancer Vaccination, Pap Smear and HPV, Reason for Abnormal Pap Smear

Additional site navigation: Human Papilloma Virus Symptom, Human Papillomavirus HPV Infection, Human Papillomavirus Infection, Human Papilloma Virus, Human Papillomavirus HPV, Human Papilloma Virus Treatment, HPV Human Papilloma Virus, Cervical Cancer Human Papilloma Virus, Oral Human Papilloma Virus, Human Papillomavirus Picture
Popular topics: Human Papillomavirus HPV Infection, Oral Human Papilloma Virus, Human Papilloma Virus in Man, Cervical Cancer and Human Papilloma Virus, Human Papilloma Virus Treatment, HPV Human Papilloma Virus, Cervical Cancer Human Papilloma Virus, Human Papilloma Virus Symptom, Human Papillomavirus HPV, Human Papillomavirus Infection

Knowledge
Methods
Risk

Copyright © 2002-2009 www.hpv-virus-treatments.org
All Rights Reserved.

Genital wart illustrations are examples of HPV conditions that can be avoided using early pap smear screening programs.